Pages

Saturday, October 31, 2020

Anne Cuthbert MA, LPC, LMHC | Food Is Not The Enemy Eating Disorders Counselor



http://foodisnottheenemy.com/

Anne Cuthbert MA, LPC, LMHC | Food Is Not The Enemy Eating Disorders Counselor
My Approach
Anne Cuthbert MA, LPC, LMHC
Owner and Practitioner of “Food Is Not The Enemy Counseling”

Anne Cuthbert is a Licensed Professional Counselor in Oregon and a Licensed Mental Health Counselor in Washington. She holds a master’s degree in Counseling Psychology from Antioch University, Santa Barbara, CA. Anne specializes in working with those with eating disorders and negative body image.

Anne’s counseling experience spans over 20 years and has included studying and working with experts in the eating disorder field, teaching counseling and communication skills classes, and assisting and managing several personal growth seminars and support groups. In addition to being an eating disorder specialist, Anne has provided counseling to people with a variety of relationship issues and early traumas, including adults who were abused as children.

As a therapist, I will help you discover how to:

Eat and enjoy the foods you really love, without worrying about gaining weight Accept and even like your body
Find and maintain your healthy weight naturally through uncovering the underlying causes for your behaviors
Focus on and improve your relationships by helping you move away from blaming food and your body
Learn to like yourself, your whole self
As a counselor, I go beyond traditional talk therapy to help you to learn healthier coping skills around food, your body, and your life in general. I use a counseling approach that will help you address the root causes of your problems around food.

Through therapy, you can end the cycle of using food and hating your body to cope with your emotional needs.

In counseling, I’ll help you make step-by-step changes that will help you overcome your problems around food and help you feel good about your body. Food issues and having a poor body image are symptoms of deeper needs that need to be met.

In order to make permanent changes you need to get to the root of the problem and find healthier ways to meet your needs. In the end, counseling will help you overcome your problems with food and how you feel about your body.

Overall, you will develop a richer and more satisfying life.

I am an acting board member of CREDN, Columbia River Eating Disorders Network. ASDAH member, Association of Size Diversity and Health, Internal Policy Committee, Membership Committee and Conference Planning Committee (co-chair).

I know first hand what it is like to deal with food and body issues. For years, I struggled with food issues and hating my body. I compared myself to every woman I saw and resisted exercising refusing to give into what other people told me I should do and how I should look. I ate to hide how I was feeling and to avoid being close to anyone. I thought I couldn’t be loved if I was fat.

Now, I am pleased to say all that has changed for the better. I no longer use food to cope. I feel good about myself, my body, and my life. I am now passionate about helping others recover as well. I love that my job as a counselor is helping you to eat whatever you want and feel good about it.

Along with my personal and professional experience with eating disorders, I am a licensed Marriage and Family Therapist in California and a Licensed Professional Counselor in Oregon and a Licensed Mental Health Counselor in Washington. I hold a Master’s Degree in Counseling Psychology from Antioch University, Santa Barbara, CA.

My counseling experience spans over 16 years and has included studying and working with experts in the eating disorder field, teaching counseling and communication skills classes, and assisting and managing several personal growth seminars and support groups. I have provided counseling to people with a variety of relationship issues, including adults who were abused as children.

I look forward to working with you. -Anne

Eating Disorders Counselor of Portland - Food Is Not The Enemy
1235 Southeast Division Street
Portland,OR,97202
(360) 726-4141
Web: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee15f719607f
Map: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee15f4c11fe2
Portland Eating Disorders Treatment. Anne Cuthbert MA, LPC, LMHC is a leading Expert for Binge Eating, Body Shame, Anorexia, Bulimia, Food Addiction & Obesity. Call (360) 726-4141

#Counseling #EatingDisorders #Portland #Therapy #Spanish #Insurance #BodyImage #BodyShame #Anorexia #Bulima

Watch Video

HOW DOES SUBOXONE WORK?|Ohio Suboxone Doctors



https://ohiosuboxonedoctors.com/.

HOW DOES SUBOXONE FUNCTION?

Suboxone jobs by changing the physical as well as blissful effects of the numbing the person is addicted to, that makes it possible to treat their addiction. Naloxone is the medication in Suboxone which avoids it from being misused.

Suboxone ought to be made use of to deal with the dependency to opiates in mix with a full dependency treatment program that consists of medical, emotional and also social assistance. It can easily be integrated into a therapy which includes principles of 12 step programs such as Narcotics Anonymous.

REGARDING DR. FETTMAN.
Dr. Fettman graduated from clinical institution at the Ohio State College University of Medication in 1973 and afterwards completed a residency in Psychiatry at the University of Michigan Medical facility's Neuropsychiatric Institute in 1976. He ended up being fully licensed to exercise medication in Michigan in 1974 as well as certified in Ohio in 1991. He came to be Board Licensed as a whole Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and also Neurology in l978.

Mark Fettmen M.D.
Ohio Suboxone Doctors
6161 Busch Boulevard, Suite 208
Columbus, Oh 43229
614-769-1587
web. https://gmbp.in/ul/5f595be6ba1f2
map. https://gmbp.in/ul/5f595bd28a8c6
#Suboxone, #Treatment, #Addiction, #Counseling, Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT)

Can Suboxone be utilized for pain monitoring?
Why Do Suboxone and Subutex aid with Pain?
Is Subutex used to treat pain?
Is Buprenorphine FDA authorized for pain management?
Can any kind of physician prescribe buprenorphine for pain or addiction?
What is Suboxone 8/2mg utilized for?
How effective is buprenorphine for discomfort?
What sort of opioid is buprenorphine?
Does buprenorphine aid nerve pain?
Is Buprenorphine the like oxyCODONE?
Does Suboxone impact your mood?
Is Buprenorphine an abused substance?
What is FLOOR COVERING?
Should I take buprenorphine?
Is Buprenorphine a Schedule II medicine?
What schedule narcotic is buprenorphine?

Watch Video

Sometimes the Healer | Bonenberger and Co.



https://stevebonenberger.com/.

Sometimes the Therapist | Bonenberger as well as Co.

· Is a band-aid and also covers small scratches with clown deals with.

· Is a suture and also closes spaces as well huge for band-aids and also makes the bleeding quit.

· Is a brute force as well as fights backs demons also big for the individual under their care to stare down on their own.

· Is a suction mug as well as Hoovers great deals of discomfort out of the really injured soul.

· Is a collection of fairy tales and advises the individual under their treatment that far better days get on the near horizon as well as fairly noticeable.

· Is a lump of clay and also just rests on the couch as well as listens.

· Is a drummer and commemorates the simplest of success for those placed under their care.

· Is a traveler and also check outs lots of lonesome train terminals on the journey to, 'where is this heading'?

· Is a spiritual counselor as well as reminds the individual under their care that God indeed is actual, as well as no, has actually not forgotten their name or zip code.

· Is a magician and draws blossoms and rabbits out of very old hats.

· Is a wonder in that they know that sans their comfort and wisdom as well as thoughtful presence the world would indeed implode upon far a lot of distanced spirits.

Occasionally the Therapist ...



I am a papa, husband, counselor, author, futurist, novelist and also an aging tennis gamer.
Steve Bonenberger|B.A., M. Div. Ongoing Post-Grad. Research studies.
Priest, audio speaker, biblical and quality guideline, author, novelist as well as storyteller.
Equipped with greater than 25 years of experience in a series of academic and creative endeavors as a senior pastor, Christian radio host, and Christian fiction writer, Steve understands what it requires to handle teams, budget plans, as well as tasks.
He is a self announced "broad view person with keen attention to information.".
He is right-minded and dedicated to every job that builds a job.
He is sincere and also genuine in relationships with others because that's just how trust fund is constructed.
His life's goal?
To help people locate methods to boost their performance, sustain their interest, and also see their visions happen.



Watch Video

Geoengineering: Ready for its Close-up?

Geoengineering: Ready for its Close-up? https://legal-planet.org/2020/10/30/geoengineering-ready-for-its-close-up/

If you’re a long-time Legal Planet reader, you may have noticed that I weigh in once a year or so to say that geoengineering – active engineered response to global climate change – is going to get prominent, and intensely contentious, soon.

Geoengineering? Before continuing, we need a brief aside about names. Even what to call it is contested and shifting. In addition to geoengineering, people call it climate engineering, climate remediation, more recently climate intervention. They argue about whether it’s all one thing, or whether various methods and approaches are so different that they should have different names and not be discussed together. The names are certainly important for debate framing, and for shaping public and political response, but they don’t change the substantive issues and arguing over what to call this stuff has become tiresome. So for this post, I’m going to call it “Norma.” (If this confuses you, check the classic Billy Wilder film, “Sunset Boulevard.”)

Norma is intentional modification of the environment at large scale – large meaning continental to global – to reduce the climate change and other harms done by elevated atmospheric greenhouse gases. Norma comes in two main types, interventions that remove CO2 or other greenhouse-gases from the atmosphere (“Carbon dioxide removal” or CDR – for this post, “Removal Norma”), and interventions that change the energy balance of the Earth, mainly by scattering an additional percent or so of incoming sunlight to make the Earth a little brighter (“Solar geoengineering,” solar radiation management, solar radiation modification—for this post, “Solar Norma”). The most prominent form of Solar Norma would spray mists of reflective aerosols in the upper atmosphere, “stratospheric aerosol injection” (SAI). “Carbon” and “Solar” are not necessarily the only possible types of Norma. Others are occasionally proposed.

For 15 years or so, Norma has been argued over by small groups of scientists, climate-policy wonks, and activists, but has not received wide attention. This changed a few years ago for Removal Norma (CDR), which has gained a surge of attention and resources since 2015. The main trigger for this came from the emissions scenarios produced to show ways of meeting the Paris climate targets, limiting global-average heating to 1.5 to 2ÂșC. Most of these required hundreds of billions of tons (GtCO2) of Removal Norma by year 2100. Solar Norma might be much more effective than Removal Norma at limiting climate risks – and act much faster – but has enjoyed no such rise in attention or respectability. On the contrary, Solar Norma has faced starkly inadequate research funding, determined opposition to even innocuous proposals for small-scale field research, marginalized and biased treatment in official assessments, and exclusion from climate scenarios. The widespread reluctance to study or research it, even to better characterize potential risks and limitations, has been widely likened to a religious ban on study or discussion of heretical doctrine.

Until now, that is. Over the past couple of months, Solar Norma is everywhere. Research funding has started to flow (although still far short of need), and research communities not formerly involved are starting to pay attention. Stories about it are appearing every week in prominent, respected publication outlets. Research and policy organizations are staffing up. It finally hit me yesterday that this change is real, when within a two-hour period both my teenaged sons sent me a link to a new video on Norma their favorite cool-science-explained Youtube channel. (BTW, the treatment of Norma in this video is excellent – it covers all the major issues accurately and clearly, and is even-handed about the scariness, the known problems and risks, and the reasons Norma still needs to be studied and considered despite these.)

So why is this happening now? Is it a good or a bad thing? And does it suggest that other things about the debate over Norma have changed?

One possible answer to the “why now” question is that it was bound to happen eventually, and that it’s happening now is just a random event. The familiar argument for increased research and governance attention to Solar Norma remains valid, indeed grows stronger as time passes:

  • Climate-change risks are severe, getting worse, and slow to deflect: climate change is a train-wreck in slow-motion;
  • Deep cuts to the emissions that are driving the changes, moving the world economy to non-carbon energy sources, is the first-priority response, essential to limiting risks;
  • But we’ve known this for 30 years, during which world emissions kept increasing except for a few flat years. With a few small exceptions, emissions-cutting efforts have thus far achieved little;
  • At this point, even an extreme effort on emissions-cuts might not adequately limit risks, given the late start and the uncertainties about the rate and impacts of climate change;
  • Removal Norma will probably help a lot, but will take decades to grow to the assumed Gt scale – and is not confidently known to work, with acceptable impacts, at that scale. So by all means pursue it, hard, but don’t bet the farm on it.
  • Solar Norma appears able to make bigger, faster changes to limit climate risks – so while it presents many scary risks and hard problems of governance and control (real problems, but potentially remediable), it may be a necessary part of an effective climate risk-limitation strategy, offering risk-reduction opportunities not available in other ways;
  • And finally, the foregoing is not a secret. So no matter how much you may hate or fear Solar Norma, you can’t guarantee that some government(s) facing severe climate impacts won’t try to use it. This strengthens the case for understanding how it would work, what risks it would pose, and how to govern it, even if the endpoint is to reject it.

With this all old news, the reason for the sudden spike in attention now could simply be that understanding of this tough situation has percolated to enough people to pass some critical scale.  And like any issue dominated by conformity and fear of speaking out, the first little crack in the wall of silence leads quickly to the dam bursting. (Mix, mix, mix those metaphors!)

But my guess is that there is more going on. The politics and public awareness of climate change are undergoing a broader transformation. The volume of alarming news about changes and impacts already occurring, the shifts in public opinion and elevation of alarm, have greatly strengthened the case for – and raised the likelihood of – serious action to cut emissions. The multiple announcements of new emissions commitments – notably China’s recent adoption of a net-zero target by 2060 – have further strengthened the sense of possibility on this front, as has the prospect of a new US administration that would take strong climate action seriously.

I speculate that all this movement toward getting serious about emissions cuts – at last! – opens a window for a serious conversation about Norma, including Solar Norma. Even a cursory examination of the extreme need for emissions cuts, and the heavy lift involved in achieving them, has to raise the question of how much can be achieved, how fast – and the severity of remaining climate risks even under the most optimistic assumptions about the ambition and effectiveness of mitigation. This line of reasoning naturally directs inquiry to other, potentially additional approaches like Norma. Moreover, the strongest objection to thinking about Norma has been the risk that Norma may distract from, or undermine support for, the needed deep emission cuts. This argument becomes less persuasive as public alarm about climate change and support for emission-cutting policies grow stronger. So Norma may really be ready for its close-up.

Whether my speculation about the cause of the current surge of attention to Norma is right or wrong, the existence of the surge is undeniable. So what happens now? What is likely to happen, and what should happen?

Part of the answer is obvious, and unchanged by the current surge of attention. The first need is for a large expansion of research into alternative methods, how they would work, and what impacts and risks they would carry. Equally essential is starting the conversation about how to research, develop, and control these technologies, how to assess and limit their risks, how to fit them into an effective overall climate response strategy. Most importantly, how can it be ensured that the development of Norma does not impair, but rather strengthens, support for the other essential elements of such a strategy, especially deep rapid cuts in world emissions. The severity and novelty of Solar Norma’s governance challenges cannot be over-stated, and if its use is ever to be considered it must be with confidence that this can happen competently, prudently, and legitimately. Whatever use is made of Solar Norma, if any, must advance – and on all accounts not impair – effective overall management of climate risks and global cooperation, development, and justice. This will be a tall order for currently weakened international governance capacity, and the exploration of how to achieve it needs to start immediately.

This emergence of Solar Norma as something that can be discussed in decent company is not without risks. Indeed, many of these risks are closely related to the concerns long expressed about Solar Norma, but the rise in attention means these previously hypothetical risks are becoming real. I’ll discuss these in future posts, including ways that some recent pathologies in debates about COVID and its responses illustrate ways things could go badly wrong with more active consideration of Solar Norma.

The post Geoengineering: Ready for its Close-up? appeared first on Legal Planet.

By: Ted Parson
Title: Geoengineering: Ready for its Close-up?
Sourced From: legal-planet.org/2020/10/30/geoengineering-ready-for-its-close-up/
Published Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 22:36:49 +0000

Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston
8313 Southwest Freeway #102
Houston,TX,77074
(713) 785-9484
#Houston #Attorneys #Lawyers #PersonalInjury #AutoAccidents #TruckAccidents #HoustonLaw #Settlements #DUI

(Houston's Most Trusted Law Firm for Car Accident Settlements)
#CarAccidentAttorney, #CarAccident Lawyer, Houston Auto Accident Attorney, Auto Accident Lawyer, Auto Accident Law Firm, Auto Accident Settlement, Car Accident Settlement, Trucking Accident Lawyers, Truck Accident Attorneys, Trucking Lawsuit Settlements, Personal Injury Lawyers, Personal Injury Attorneys, Personal Injury Lawsuit Settlements

Vist Maida on Social Me


Website Links



Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston, by fuseology


https://legal-planet.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Earth-image-400x300.jpg

Porsche x Asphalt: A three years retrospective

Porsche x Asphalt: A three years retrospective https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1ANdX6akzU

To mark the 3rd anniversary of Porsche in Asphalt, take a look at the fleet of iconic cars with which you can play in our celebration video.

Which models would you want to see added in the future?
_
718 Cayman: Fuel consumption combined: 8,1 l/100 km; CO2 emissions combined: 185 g/km; 718 Cayman GT4: Fuel consumption combined: 10,9 - 10,2 l/100 km; CO2 emissions combined: 249 - 232 g/km I Status: 10/2020

Follow Porsche on Instagram: https://porsche.click/2R1FOPM
Like Porsche on Facebook: https://porsche.click/3dFSRQs
Subscribe to Porsche on YouTube: https://porsche.click/2WWDxZZ
Visit the Porsche Website: https://porsche.click/2yprQAR

*Weitere Informationen zum offiziellen Kraftstoffverbrauch und den offiziellen spezifischen CO2-Emissionen neuer Personenkraftwagen können dem 'Leitfaden ĂŒber den Kraftstoffverbrauch, die CO2-Emissionen und den Stromverbrauch neuer Personenkraftwagen' entnommen werden, der an allen Verkaufsstellen und bei und bei der Deutschen Automobil Treuhand GmbH unter http://www.dat.de/?sf118523178=1 unentgeltlich erhĂ€ltlich ist

By: Porsche
Title: Porsche x Asphalt: A three years retrospective
Sourced From: www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1ANdX6akzU

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/J1ANdX6akzU/hqdefault.jpg

Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar

Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar https://houston.eater.com/2020/10/28/21538271/la-colombe-dor-new-restaurant-tonight-tomorrow-montrose A luxurious dining room with green velvet chairs, marble tables and wood flooring Tonight & Tomorrow at La Colombe D’or | La Colombe D’or/Facebook

Expect dishes like boudin-stuffed quail at the new European eatery Tonight & Tomorrow, and a refreshed interior at the iconic mansion’s bar

La Colombe D’or, the longtime Montrose boutique hotel nestled in a historic mansion, has announced a lavish new restaurant that will debut when renovations at the hotel are complete.

Called Tonight & Tomorrow, the restaurant will focus on a menu of European-inspired dishes that showcase Houston’s rich cultural and culinary history, made with seasonal ingredients sourced from local farms. The menu will include dishes like graxlax served with lavash, boudin-stuffed quail served with braised greens and pickled mustard seed, and lavish. The restaurant will also serve lunch and a full menu of craft cocktails. Jonathan Wicks, who was previously the executive chef at The Monarch at Hotel Zaza, will lead the kitchen.

In addition to Tonight & Tomorrow, the Bar at La Colombe D’or is getting a facelift. Previously one of Houston’s best kept secrets, The Bar, which is situated in the mansion’s former den, will serve light breakfast and coffee in the mornings, and small plates from afternoon until late evening, alongside classic and craft cocktails and a extensive international wine list. Both the restaurant and bar will offer indoor and outdoor seating.

The hotel is located in a 1923 mansion that was originally built for Humble oil co-founder Walter Fondren and his family. It includes details like 300-year-old French wood paneling and classical architecture. The mansion was converted into a hotel in 1979 and was eventually bought by Houston businessman Steve Zimmerman in the early 1980s. In 1973, Zimmerman had opened the first wine bar in the state of Texas, Zimm’s, just a few blocks down from the Fondren House, according to the Houston Chronicle. Zimmerman still owns the mansion and is overseeing its renovation, which is being completed by Hines.

Those renovations began in 2018 and include upgrades to the original building, as well as the construction of a 34-story luxury residential high rise behind the original home. The hotel, along with Tonight & Tomorrow, is expected to reopen by the end of 2020.

  • Montrose’s La Colombe d’Or gears up to welcome more guests after renovation [Houston Chronicle]
  • The Future of Houston’s Restaurant and Food Scene [EHOU]


By: Brittanie Shey
Title: Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar
Sourced From: houston.eater.com/2020/10/28/21538271/la-colombe-dor-new-restaurant-tonight-tomorrow-montrose
Published Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:02:27 +0000

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology

Read More

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/lDQlZaGzL95xUvobmNN2KNM4OZc=/0x254:1122x1096/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67702108/tonighttomorrow.0.jpg

Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar

Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar https://houston.eater.com/2020/10/28/21538271/la-colombe-dor-new-restaurant-tonight-tomorrow-montrose A luxurious dining room with green velvet chairs, marble tables and wood flooring Tonight & Tomorrow at La Colombe D’or | La Colombe D’or/Facebook

Expect dishes like boudin-stuffed quail at the new European eatery Tonight & Tomorrow, and a refreshed interior at the iconic mansion’s bar

La Colombe D’or, the longtime Montrose boutique hotel nestled in a historic mansion, has announced a lavish new restaurant that will debut when renovations at the hotel are complete.

Called Tonight & Tomorrow, the restaurant will focus on a menu of European-inspired dishes that showcase Houston’s rich cultural and culinary history, made with seasonal ingredients sourced from local farms. The menu will include dishes like graxlax served with lavash, boudin-stuffed quail served with braised greens and pickled mustard seed, and lavish. The restaurant will also serve lunch and a full menu of craft cocktails. Jonathan Wicks, who was previously the executive chef at The Monarch at Hotel Zaza, will lead the kitchen.

In addition to Tonight & Tomorrow, the Bar at La Colombe D’or is getting a facelift. Previously one of Houston’s best kept secrets, The Bar, which is situated in the mansion’s former den, will serve light breakfast and coffee in the mornings, and small plates from afternoon until late evening, alongside classic and craft cocktails and a extensive international wine list. Both the restaurant and bar will offer indoor and outdoor seating.

The hotel is located in a 1923 mansion that was originally built for Humble oil co-founder Walter Fondren and his family. It includes details like 300-year-old French wood paneling and classical architecture. The mansion was converted into a hotel in 1979 and was eventually bought by Houston businessman Steve Zimmerman in the early 1980s. In 1973, Zimmerman had opened the first wine bar in the state of Texas, Zimm’s, just a few blocks down from the Fondren House, according to the Houston Chronicle. Zimmerman still owns the mansion and is overseeing its renovation, which is being completed by Hines.

Those renovations began in 2018 and include upgrades to the original building, as well as the construction of a 34-story luxury residential high rise behind the original home. The hotel, along with Tonight & Tomorrow, is expected to reopen by the end of 2020.

  • Montrose’s La Colombe d’Or gears up to welcome more guests after renovation [Houston Chronicle]
  • The Future of Houston’s Restaurant and Food Scene [EHOU]


By: Brittanie Shey
Title: Ritzy Montrose Hotel La Colombe D’Or Will Add Restaurant and Revamped Bar
Sourced From: houston.eater.com/2020/10/28/21538271/la-colombe-dor-new-restaurant-tonight-tomorrow-montrose
Published Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:02:27 +0000

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology

Read More

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/lDQlZaGzL95xUvobmNN2KNM4OZc=/0x254:1122x1096/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67702108/tonighttomorrow.0.jpg

Friday, October 30, 2020

Just how Do I Receive Compensation for My Injuries After a 18 Wheel Mishap?



https://maidalawfirm.net

Exactly how Do I Get Compensated for My Injuries After an Auto Accident?

If you have actually been wounded in an eighteen-wheeler collision or comparable type of trucking mishap, you may be qualified to settlement for clinical bills, lost salaries, shed future earning possibility, pain as well as suffering as well as even more. What you do instantly after a truck mishap can make the difference between winning and also shedding your instance. The amount of your potential healing might depend upon taking the appropriate steps after the truck mishap. Among the first steps is getting the clinical therapy you might require to deal with as well as record your injuries and also medical problems. An experienced vehicle accident attorney can offer you with accessibility to clinical therapy at no expense costs to you. You might also need to maintain any proof both from the scene of the crash as well as likewise evidence in the belongings of the trucking company or its chauffeur, such as motorist's logs, work documents, chauffeur training plans as well as treatments, etc. Your vehicle crash legal representative will assist you with the process as well as see to it the correct steps are taken to shield and optimize your claim. If required, a legal action may be essential. You are compensated for your damages when a winning negotiation or decision is reached in your case.



Call The Maida Law Practice.
Vehicle Mishap Attorneys of Houston.

We Offer a Free Examination.
Call Today 713-785-9484.
Hablamos español. Consultas gratis.

Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston
8313 Southwest Freeway #102
Houston,TX,77074
(713) 785-9484
WEB: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee3c87c50901
MAP: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee3c8871b2c3
#Houston #Attorneys #Lawyers #PersonalInjury #AutoAccidents #TruckAccidents #HoustonLaw #Settlements #DUI

( Houston's The majority of Trusted Law Firm for Auto Mishap Settlements).
Cars And Truck Mishap Attorney, Car Mishap Legal Representative, Houston Automobile Accident Lawyer, Automobile Mishap Attorney, Vehicle Mishap Law Firm, Vehicle Accident Negotiation, Car Mishap Negotiation, Trucking Mishap Lawyers, Truck Crash Attorneys, Trucking Legal Action Settlements, Accident Attorney, Accident Attorneys, Injury Suit Settlements.



Watch Video

The Grief Paradigm of Affairs | Thrive Relational Therapy - Marriage Counseling of Vancouver



https://thriverelationaltherapy.com/

The Despair Paradigm of Affairs
If you have searched for events or extramarital relations on the web, you have actually likely obtained an onslaught of details, largely related to just how bad the affair partner is, just how their ethical compass is off, and the oldie but goodie, "as soon as a cheater, constantly a cheater" rubbish. But if you are the person that had the event, this has a tendency to be less than valuable and can make you reduce as well as run, causing more distress. While this post will absolutely be difficult to read if you have actually been betrayed, this may be helpful for the person that did the betraying. And also no, I am not mosting likely to lean right into the discussion that the affair has a shared responsibility in the initial partnership (although it does) Instead, I am mosting likely to speak about sorrow and also events.

As a therapist that works with extramarital relations a whole lot, I see the gamut of experiences from people. Some heal quickly, some do not recover whatsoever. But much of the operate in infidelity counseling for couples is based on rebuilding trust fund and also accessory in the key connection, which also means it is mainly concentrated on the non upseting partner. And also although it's rarely talked about, and most likely should not be in the couples establishing, the offending partner is entrusted to regret as well as experience their own emotions totally on their own. So, if you had an event, this short article is for you.

No matter the factor's you entered into the event, and also regardless of if the affair lasted 3 months or 3 years, you likely have some feelings regarding it ending. Many individuals, are so concentrated on the pity or regret of being caught, or finishing the relationship that they forget they are experiencing a complicated wave of feelings also. I typically see individuals that experience, what I am calling the double despair paradigm. On one hand they are grieving the end of the event relationship. This may be regreting the loss of exhilaration, of spontaneity, of sex, or might be regreting the loss of somebody they liked. But since this is an affair, it is ambiguous. Society does not give then the capability to truly grieve the loss of the connection "that ought to never ever have actually existed" At the same time they are grieve their original relationship. Sometimes this looks like their original connection finishing. However in some cases this is a re-engagement in a connection that was poor to begin with. Other times it is grieving the adjustment in their partnership, probably less freedom, or the exhaustion of the count on structure procedure. This is also often ambiguous, as many times people keep their affairs hidden from loved ones as a result of embarassment or shame. What this implies for the person with the despair standard is that points get intricate and also sticky. As well as one minute they may be crying as well as depressing for the loss of the event companion, as well as the following they may really feel tremendous pity for having had an event to begin with.

This paradigm produces the demand for specific therapy. It creates the need for healing on several degrees and comprehending from their partner or buddies that this phase is confusing. This develops the demand for self compassion, and also strengthening an understanding. The lower line, is that the despair won't simply disappear. It will certainly come in waves, as well as hit you at times that you most desire it wouldn't. The only excellent information that comes from this, is that the pain will create growth. And also development can never ever be a poor thing! Call today id you experience the affair sorrow standard.

Thrive Relational Therapy - Marriage Counseling of Vancouver
400 East Evergreen Blvd, Suite 205
Vancouver, WA 98660
(360) 450-2327
info@thriverelationaltherapy.com
WEB: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2d9350bc35
MAP: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2d9455ddd9

#Marriage Counselor #Counselor #Sexologist #Family Counselor #Occupational Therapist #Family Planning Counselor

#Marriage Counselor #Counselor #Sexologist #Family Therapist #Occupational Specialist #Family Planning Therapist



Watch Video

I Had an Affair and the Guilt is Killing Me | Thrive Relational Therapy



https://thriverelationaltherapy.com/

I Had an Event and also the Shame is Killing Me|Flourish Relational Therapy

I had an event, the regret is eliminating me!

If you read this, I'm guessing you remain in the hot box. You may be puzzled as to just how to proceed, what to do following. You have actually had an event, perhaps you have actually currently informed your companion about it, maybe you have not. Yet regardless it's consuming at you. What does it mean, that You, of all people had an affair? What does this state concerning you? About your ethical character? Can this be repaired? Are you broken? These among other sensations are very common in the consequences. And as you look the web for solutions, you are likely swamped with confirmation of your deepest worries. The blogs you are locating is most likely reiterating that you remain in truth bad, and also damaged as well as most of all 100% to blame.

I am here to tell you that none of the above holds true. You are not broken, you are likely okay and things can get better. Part of my task as a therapist is to continue to be neutral adequate to understand the patterns of connections. This aids me to after that take part in the pattern and change relationships right into modification. And I'll be straightforward, as a counselor that functions a whole lot with cheating, it's not always simple. Pairs come in all set responsible as well as not take liability. We are informed the cheater is incorrect and also negative, and the companion of the cheater is best and also good. This just merely is not true. It's not that apparent. So my hope is that as you are surfing the net, you will certainly locate this blog and others that take do not take a moral high ground. That give a reasonable analysis of the circumstance as well as permit you to establish what your following actions are if you actually were the one that had an event.

There are actions to recovery after an affair that are important. And also one of them is determining just how to divulge to your partner as well as restore depend on. However one that is usually missed out on in the blogs as well as write-ups is establishing why the event took place to begin with. This isn't a self loathing trip, but one that truly takes a look at the depth of the relationships and comprehends that pattern that opened the door for an affair. The pairs that are most effective in event recuperation are the ones that agree to take a shateringly sincere look at the relationship, take liability for their individual components in it, and also start healing from there. Are you prepared to begin that trip?

Thrive Relational Therapy - Marriage Counseling of Vancouver
400 East Evergreen Blvd, Suite 205
Vancouver, WA 98660
(360) 450-2327
info@thriverelationaltherapy.com
WEB: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2d9350bc35
MAP: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2d9455ddd9

#Marriage Counselor #Counselor #Sexologist #Family Counselor #Occupational Therapist #Family Planning Counselor

#Marriage Counselor #Counselor #Sexologist #Family Therapist #Occupational Specialist #Family Planning Therapist



Watch Video

Medication-Assisted Treatment (FLOOR COVERING)|Ohio Suboxone Medical professionals



https://ohiosuboxonedoctors.com/.

Medication-Assisted Therapy (FLOOR COVERING).
Discover exactly how medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is utilized to treat compound use disorders along with sustain healing and also avoid overdose.
Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) is making use of drugs, in combination with counseling and behavioral therapies, to give a "whole-patient" strategy to the therapy of substance usage conditions. Drugs used in FLOOR COVERING are accepted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and FLOOR COVERING programs are scientifically driven as well as customized to meet each person's requirements.

Research reveals that a combination of medication and treatment can successfully treat these problems, as well as for some people fighting with addiction, FLOOR COVERING can assist maintain healing. FLOOR COVERING is also used to prevent or decrease opioid overdose.

Learn about many of the substance use problems that FLOOR COVERING is made to attend to.

MAT is mostly used for the therapy of addiction to opioids such as heroin as well as prescription painkiller which contain narcotics. The prescribed drug operates to normalize mind chemistry, obstruct the euphoric results of alcohol and opioids, relieve physical cravings, and also stabilize body features without the unfavorable and also euphoric effects of the material made use of.

MAT Efficiency.
In 2018, an estimated 2 million people had an opioid use condition which includes prescription discomfort drug containing narcotics as well as heroin.

MAT has verified to be medically effective as well as to considerably reduce the need for inpatient cleansing solutions for these individuals. FLOOR COVERING offers an extra detailed, separately tailored program of medication as well as behavior modification that attend to the needs of most people.

The best goal of MAT is complete recovery, consisting of the ability to live a self-directed life. This therapy method has been revealed to:.

Improve individual survival.
Boost retention in treatment.
Decline immoral opiate usage and also various other criminal activity amongst people with compound usage disorders.
Increase people' capability to get and also keep employment.
Boost birth outcomes amongst women who have substance usage conditions as well as are pregnant.
Study also shows that these drugs and also therapies can add to lowering a person's danger of contracting HIV or liver disease C by decreasing the capacity for regression. Learn more concerning substance misuse and just how it associates with HIV, AIDS, and also Viral Liver disease.

Discover more regarding co-occurring disorders and also various other health and wellness problems.

MAT Medications.
FDA has actually authorized several different medications to deal with alcohol as well as opioid usage disorders MAT drugs ease the withdrawal signs and symptoms and also emotional food cravings that cause chemical inequalities in the body. Medications utilized for FLOOR COVERING are evidence-based treatment choices and do not just replace one medicine for one more.

Alcohol Use Condition Medications.
Acamprosate, disulfiram, and also naltrexone are one of the most typical medications used to treat alcohol use condition. They do not provide a remedy for the problem, but are most effective in people that take part in a FLOOR COVERING program. Discover more concerning the effect of alcohol abuse.

Opioid Reliance Medications.
Buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone are utilized to treat opioid usage problems to short-acting opioids such as heroin, morphine, and codeine, in addition to semi-synthetic opioids like oxycodone as well as hydrocodone. These MAT drugs are risk-free to utilize for months, years, or even a life time. Just like any type of medicine, consult your doctor prior to stopping usage.

Opioid Overdose Avoidance Medication.
Naloxone is used to prevent opioid overdose by reversing the hazardous results of the overdose. According to the Globe Wellness Company (THAT), naloxone is one of a number of medicines taken into consideration essential to a functioning health care system.

ABOUT DR. FETTMAN.
Dr. Fettman graduated from clinical institution at the Ohio State University University of Medication in 1973 and afterwards finished a residency in Psychiatry at the University of Michigan Medical facility's Neuropsychiatric Institute in 1976. He became fully accredited to exercise medicine in Michigan in 1974 and licensed in Ohio in 1991. He came to be Board Qualified generally Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry as well as Neurology in l978.

Mark Fettmen M.D.
Ohio Suboxone Doctors
6161 Busch Boulevard, Suite 208
Columbus, Oh 43229
614-769-1587
web. https://gmbp.in/ul/5f595be6ba1f2
map. https://gmbp.in/ul/5f595bd28a8c6
#Suboxone, #Treatment, #Addiction, #Counseling, Medically Assisted Treatment (MAT)

Can Suboxone be made use of for discomfort administration?
Why Do Suboxone as well as Subutex assist with Pain?
Is Subutex utilized to treat discomfort?
Is Buprenorphine FDA authorized for pain monitoring?
Can any kind of physician prescribe buprenorphine for pain or dependency?
What is Suboxone 8/2mg utilized for?
Exactly how efficient is buprenorphine for pain?
What type of opioid is buprenorphine?
Does buprenorphine assistance nerve discomfort?
Is Buprenorphine the same as oxyCODONE?
Does Suboxone affect your state of mind?
Is Buprenorphine a controlled substance?
What is MAT?
Should I take buprenorphine?
Is Buprenorphine an Arrange II medication?
What routine narcotic is buprenorphine?

Watch Video

Short and Simple Climate Legislation

Short and Simple Climate Legislation https://legal-planet.org/2020/10/29/short-and-simple-climate-legislation/

The last time Congress tried to pass climate change legislation, the bill was about 800 pages long. That bill, the Waxman-Markey Act, tried to adopt a comprehensive set of emissions reduction measures, which is a complicated business.  But a much simpler law could allow the U.S. to move forward quickly with less ambitious but still highly significant actions.  Such a law would also void some of Trump’s most important rollbacks.

All it would take would be four or five pages of legislation, if the new Congress is so minded. Below are four areas where adding a sentence or two to the Clean Air Act — and sometimes only a phrase or two — could eliminate legal uncertainties and supercharge regulatory efforts.  If you’re not in the weeds of this stuff, your main takeaway should be the simplicity of these fixes.

Reorient the Act toward climate change. To ensure that limiting climate change is considered an EPA priority, add a new subsection (5) to the congressional findings in section 101(a).  The new congressional finding would say “that the emission of greenhouse gases gravely endangers human health and welfare.”  (In the interest of clarity, one could instead include a list of known greenhouse gases.) And add the following to subsection (d), relating to the purposes of the Clean Air Act: “(5) to reduce net U.S. emissions of greenhouse gases by at least 40% by 2030 and 80% by 2050.” Obviously those numbers can be shifted depending on Congress’s level of ambition.

EPA jurisdiction over greenhouse gases.  To eliminate any doubts on this score, amend section 302(g) by adding the following sentence: “A substance causing or contributing to global climate change constitutes an air pollutant.”

These changes would not only be useful legally, but they would dispel the notion that it’s somehow illegitimate to use the Clean Air Act to address climate change.

Legality of Obama’s  Clean Power Plan.  To ensure that courts will uphold future efforts similar to Obama’s Clean Power Plan, amend section 111(a)(1) by adding;

“A standard of performance for a greenhouse gas may include regulations governing the frequency or extent of use of facilities, change the fuels used at facilities, or in whole or in part require the use of low or zero emission facilities or processes.”

Also amend section 111(d) by inserting in the first sentence, after the word “air pollutant,”  the phrase “that is a greenhouse gas; or….”

State car standards. To allow all state programs for electric vehicles to go forward without being under the cloud of preemption by federal law, add the following at the end of section 209(a): “This prohibition shall not apply to any state law mandating the sale of zero emission vehicles.”

To ensure the availability of a waiver for California standards, add to section 209(b)(1)(B), the phrase “or to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.” To clarify that states are authorized to impose standards that have the effect of requiring increased fuel efficiency, add to the parenthetical in the body of section 209(b)(1) the phrase “but shall include requirements for reduction of carbon dioxide emissions.”

Getting anything through Congress can be a heroic undertaking. But really, all these changes do is to clarify existing law.  Yet these simple clarifications would provide much more confidence that vigorous climate action would survive review by the courts.

The post Short and Simple Climate Legislation appeared first on Legal Planet.

By: Dan Farber
Title: Short and Simple Climate Legislation
Sourced From: legal-planet.org/2020/10/29/short-and-simple-climate-legislation/
Published Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 14:34:50 +0000

Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston
8313 Southwest Freeway #102
Houston,TX,77074
(713) 785-9484
#Houston #Attorneys #Lawyers #PersonalInjury #AutoAccidents #TruckAccidents #HoustonLaw #Settlements #DUI

(Houston's Most Trusted Law Firm for Car Accident Settlements)
#CarAccidentAttorney, #CarAccident Lawyer, Houston Auto Accident Attorney, Auto Accident Lawyer, Auto Accident Law Firm, Auto Accident Settlement, Car Accident Settlement, Trucking Accident Lawyers, Truck Accident Attorneys, Trucking Lawsuit Settlements, Personal Injury Lawyers, Personal Injury Attorneys, Personal Injury Lawsuit Settlements

Vist Maida on Social Me


Website Links



Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston, by fuseology


https://legal-planet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/8395638677_ab9b29398c_o-400x300.jpg

Esmee Hawkey drives the 911 Carrera S

Esmee Hawkey drives the 911 Carrera S https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk6EAqvkQyA

Esmee Hawkey, Porsche Carrera Cup GB driver joined us as at Goodwood Speedweek where she took the 911 Carrera S for the first time around Goodwood motor circuit.
Discover the differences between her 911 GT3 Cup and the Carrera S.
__
911 Carrera S: Fuel consumption combined: 10,0 - 9,6 l/100 km; CO2 emissions combined: 227 - 220 g/km I https://porsche.click/DAT-Leitfaden I Status: 10/2020

Follow Porsche on Instagram: https://porsche.click/2R1FOPM
Like Porsche on Facebook: https://porsche.click/3dFSRQs
Subscribe to Porsche on YouTube: https://porsche.click/2WWDxZZ
Visit the Porsche Website: https://porsche.click/2yprQAR

*Weitere Informationen zum offiziellen Kraftstoffverbrauch und den offiziellen spezifischen CO2-Emissionen neuer Personenkraftwagen können dem 'Leitfaden ĂŒber den Kraftstoffverbrauch, die CO2-Emissionen und den Stromverbrauch neuer Personenkraftwagen' entnommen werden, der an allen Verkaufsstellen und bei und bei der Deutschen Automobil Treuhand GmbH unter http://www.dat.de/?sf118523178=1 unentgeltlich erhĂ€ltlich ist

By: Porsche
Title: Esmee Hawkey drives the 911 Carrera S
Sourced From: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kk6EAqvkQyA

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology https://i4.ytimg.com/vi/kk6EAqvkQyA/hqdefault.jpg

Genius Course|Bonenberger and Co.



https://stevebonenberger.com/.
https://stevebonenberger.com/course/concentrated-self-care/.

Brilliant Path:.
Concentrated Self-Care.

I actually such as this combined idea: that as you gather and acquire proficiency over your very own YOU, that the procedure maximizes and then familiarizes you with your very own, true brilliant.

Genius Path:.

The idea that within you lives this glide-path in the direction of achievement.

The notion that your contribution to this world is really unique.

The awareness that without you, raking deep into the underbrush of your own incidents, you simply can not see the glaze of your genius.

The expertise, the deep, ingrained knowledge that you have some nugget of info, some kernel of essential truth, some hidden secret to recognizing Elegance is releasing.

The understanding that brilliant is a bit fickle and maybe a bit of a coquette. And that you have to tease and court as well as trigger to bring it to the surface.

The determination to work through your very own manure.

The courage to deal with as well as gaze down your own existential satanic forces.

The frank as well as adult conversations with on your own that suppress your past missed-steps and replace every one of them with today and effective and adaptive you.

The Grind.

The genuine you begins to enjoy the hard work.

The genuine you swims in the undersurface of your ocean.

The actual you embraces problem and also also pokes fun at the very danger of new developing satanic forces.

Stamina. You are greater than a conqueror.



I am a papa, partner, therapist, writer, futurist, novelist as well as an aging tennis gamer.
Steve Bonenberger|B.A., M. Div. Recurring Post-Grad. Studies.
Pastor, speaker, biblical and also excellence guideline, essayist, writer and writer.
Armed with more than 25 years of experience in a series of academic as well as imaginative ventures as a senior pastor, Christian radio host, and Christian fiction author, Steve understands what it takes to take care of teams, budgets, as well as jobs.
He is a self declared "broad view individual with keen attention to information.".
He is principled and committed to every job that constructs a job.
He is truthful as well as authentic in connections with others since that's how trust is constructed.
His life's goal?
To assist individuals find methods to boost their efficiency, sustain their passion, and see their visions occur.



Watch Video

A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble

A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble https://houston.eater.com/2020/10/29/21540423/blue-lagoon-bar-grill-opening-humble-balmoral A manmade lagoon with turquoise water and white sands. The lagoon at Balmoral in Humble will soon be home to a first-of-its-kind restaurant. | Balmoral Lagoon/Facebook

The Blue Lagoon Bar and Grill will boast sunset views and chicken and waffles on the menu

A first-of-its-kind restaurant is opening soon on the crystal clear waters of the lagoon at Balmoral in Humble.

The restaurant, called The Blue Lagoon Bar & Grill, will give diners a sunset view of the waters and white sand of the manmade 2-acre lagoon. It’ll serve a wide variety of dishes, like steak, Italian food, burgers, and sandwiches, including signature items like pork medallions wrapped in bacon and drizzled with chipotle hollandaise sauce, and chicken and waffles with cheesy grits and Aleppo pepper.

The restaurant will also be available for events like weddings, parties and corporate events, It’s expected to open in early November and will serve food from noon to 9 p.m. Wednesday through Sunday. When it does open, it’ll be the first restaurant alongside a Crystal Lagoon amenity,

These crystal lagoons have been popping up throughout the Houston area in recent years, with locations near Texas City and Rosharon. The Humble lagoon, in the Balmoral development, opened in 2018 and was the first in Texas. The lagoons feature turquoise water and white sand beaches, with a special man-made technology that keeps the water from getting cloudy or sandy. The lagoons also feature amenities like splash pads, paddle boarding, and now, sunset dining.


By: Brittanie Shey
Title: A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble
Sourced From: houston.eater.com/2020/10/29/21540423/blue-lagoon-bar-grill-opening-humble-balmoral
Published Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:51:25 +0000

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology

Read More

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/hi06MZO83f4OBEGl5iiUV7TRMKc=/0x96:768x672/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67709136/blue_lagoon.0.jpg

A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble

A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble https://houston.eater.com/2020/10/29/21540423/blue-lagoon-bar-grill-opening-humble-balmoral A manmade lagoon with turquoise water and white sands. The lagoon at Balmoral in Humble will soon be home to a first-of-its-kind restaurant. | Balmoral Lagoon/Facebook

The Blue Lagoon Bar and Grill will boast sunset views and chicken and waffles on the menu

A first-of-its-kind restaurant is opening soon on the crystal clear waters of the lagoon at Balmoral in Humble.

The restaurant, called The Blue Lagoon Bar & Grill, will give diners a sunset view of the waters and white sand of the manmade 2-acre lagoon. It’ll serve a wide variety of dishes, like steak, Italian food, burgers, and sandwiches, including signature items like pork medallions wrapped in bacon and drizzled with chipotle hollandaise sauce, and chicken and waffles with cheesy grits and Aleppo pepper.

The restaurant will also be available for events like weddings, parties and corporate events, It’s expected to open in early November and will serve food from noon to 9 p.m. Wednesday through Sunday. When it does open, it’ll be the first restaurant alongside a Crystal Lagoon amenity,

These crystal lagoons have been popping up throughout the Houston area in recent years, with locations near Texas City and Rosharon. The Humble lagoon, in the Balmoral development, opened in 2018 and was the first in Texas. The lagoons feature turquoise water and white sand beaches, with a special man-made technology that keeps the water from getting cloudy or sandy. The lagoons also feature amenities like splash pads, paddle boarding, and now, sunset dining.


By: Brittanie Shey
Title: A New Restaurant Will Soon Bring Comfort Food and Lagoon Views to Humble
Sourced From: houston.eater.com/2020/10/29/21540423/blue-lagoon-bar-grill-opening-humble-balmoral
Published Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:51:25 +0000

Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales
2121 East Freeway
Baytown,TX,77521
(281) 393-7202
#Forklifts #Houston #Rentals #Service #Sales #UsedForklifts


Southeast Forklifts of Houston - Used Forklift Equipment Sales, by fuseology

Read More

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/hi06MZO83f4OBEGl5iiUV7TRMKc=/0x96:768x672/1310x983/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67709136/blue_lagoon.0.jpg

Thursday, October 29, 2020

Is depression a severe disease? | TMS Serivces of Vancouver



https://www.tmsservicesofvancouver.com/

Is anxiety a severe condition? | TMS Serivces of Vancouver

Yes. The National Institute of Mental Health and wellness maintains that, "Depressive illness can commonly interfere with normal operating and also create pain and also suffering not just to those that have the problem, yet to those who respect them. Serious clinical depression can damage family life as well as the life of the sick person." A national research of anxiety discovered that almost all the respondents who reported a significant depressive disorder likewise reported that their social and/or work lives were negatively affected by their illness.1 In 2010, the financial worry of clinical depression was approximated at $210 billion in the US2 and anxiety was the second leading reason for disability, accounting for almost 20% of all years of life lost to impairment as well as sudden death.3 Depression can likewise be a lethal illness. Annually in the United States, over 30,000 people die by suicide, 60% of whom struggle with depression.

TEXT ME - 360-226-8735
TMS Serivces of Vancouver
Elia Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M.D.
1498 S.E. Tech Center Place Suite 110
Vancouver, Washington 98683
(360) 831-2276 Fax (360) 326-2606
Web: https://lnkw.co/TMSServicesofVancouver
Map: https://lnkw.co/TMSSerivcesVancovuer
Gmb: https://lnkw.co/TMSServicesVancouverGMB
#Depression #TMS #Transcranial #Addiction #Psychiatrist #Counseling #Therapy #Magnetic #Vancouver #Dr.EliaGonzalez

Watch Video

Don't Lose Anymore Clients!|Fuseology Creative and Rinbot Innovation

https://fuseologycreative.com.
https://fuseologycreative.com/ringbot.

Don't Shed Anymore Clients!|Fuseology Creative as well as Rinbot Technology.

Did you understand that you are 900% most likely to involve with a new consumer if you call them within 5 mins after they inquired? We have software that will guarantee the consumer as well as you business will certainly be linked in under 20 secs.

Would you like to boost the conversion prices on your site and give you consumers a far better experience without driving any type of extra web traffic?

Do you have problem with your team not calling individuals back quick sufficient, do days pass at some time before a person calls a request from your site?

RingBot, Chatbot and Textbot ALL-IN-ONE.

Did you know that you are 900% more likely to engage with a new customer if you call them within 5 mins after they requested information? We have software that will assure the client and you service will be connected in under 20 secs.

Promptly Convert Site Visitors Into Leads And Then Customers ...
Quickly interact with your visitors using our multi-channel interaction software.

Considerably Boost Sales From Your Site By Increasing Conversion Rates and Improving Your Customers Experience!

Do Not Make Your Consumers Wait.
92% of all client communications occur over the phone. (Salesforce).
It takes approximately 8 sales call efforts to get to a prospect. (SiriusDecisions).

TEXT ME - (206)202-7142
Fuseology Creative SEO Marketing Agency
1509 NE 83rd Ct
Vancouver WA 98664-4093
(360) 602-2655
WEB: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2dec680e21
MAP: https://gmbp.in/ul/5ee2ded3d4a79
RINGBOT: https://gmbp.in/ul/5f0ccd0fdd78f
WATCH THIS VIDEO: https://gmbp.in/ul/5f0ccd753fe58
#SEO #WebDesign #Vancouver #Marketing #CallWidget #RingBot

Watch Video

Climate Policymaking in the Shadow of the Supreme Court

Climate Policymaking in the Shadow of the Supreme Court https://legal-planet.org/2020/10/27/climate-policymaking-in-the-shadow-of-the-supreme-court/

By Ann Carlson, Amelia KeyesBen Harris  and  Dallas Burtraw

The confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett to fill the seat left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has catapulted the Supreme Court back onto the front pages of newspapers around the country. Though press attention has focused on abortion, same sex marriage, healthcare policy, and the outcome of the presidential election, the shift in the Court’s composition could also have profound implications for environmental regulation. Even without the addition of a Justice Barrett, five members of the Court have already expressed serious skepticism about expansive executive power, at least when exercised to regulate environmental pollution. With a sixth member likely to embrace a similar viewpoint, the odds are even greater that the Court could dramatically limit executive agency power.

If the presidency changes hands in November, the federal government is likely to turn its attention toward reducing domestic emissions of greenhouse gases that cause climate change. New climate change policies could come from Congress, especially if Democrats gain a majority of seats in the US Senate, and new regulations could be implemented using existing executive power, under statutes like the Clean Air Act. Either approach faces potential legal pitfalls, though it is hard to predict exactly what those pitfalls might entail. The US Supreme Court could use two legal doctrines—the nondelegation and major questions doctrines, either together or separately—to overturn climate legislation or regulations issued to cut carbon pollution. The exact parameters of those doctrines are unclear because the Court has used them only infrequently; the nondelegation doctrine has not been used to strike down a statute or regulation in 85 years. Nevertheless, several justices have discussed the doctrines recently, suggesting they may impose greater oversight over the regulatory authority of administrative agencies and limit Congress’s ability to delegate authority to those agencies in the first place.

Supreme Court Specters

In July of this year, Resources for the Future and the UCLA School of Law’s Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment convened a group of leading legal and policy experts to discuss the constitutional concerns that could pose challenges to federal climate policy. The group discussed the Court’s development of the nondelegation and major questions doctrines, both of which the Court could use to place limits on regulatory agency authority. The Court may resurrect the long-dormant nondelegation doctrine to limit Congress’s ability to delegate its legislative powers to another branch of government. Using this doctrine, the Court could limit the degree of policy discretion Congress can grant to an agency, such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to carry out Congress’s stated goals. The Court could also use the major questions doctrine—a more recently developed tool of statutory construction deployed to scrutinize an agency’s authority to regulate—either in tandem with the nondelegation doctrine or on its own. The major questions doctrine assumes that Congress would not grant an agency  authority to regulate on an issue that is not explicitly mentioned in the governing statute, particularly when that area involves important and socially significant policy issues with large economic implications. The major questions doctrine was used, for example, to prohibit the Food and Drug Administration from regulating tobacco in FDA v. Brown & Williamson. Neither of these doctrines is particularly well-developed or articulated; nevertheless, they loom as potential obstacles to ambitious climate regulation.

The basic concern that animates proponents of a resuscitated nondelegation doctrine is that regulatory agencies that implement federal laws should not, in doing so, “legislate.”  Five members of the current Supreme Court—Chief Justice Roberts as well as Justices Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Thomas—have indicated that they may be willing to revive the nondelegation doctrine, though exactly how they would do so is unclear. The general idea, though, is that the more discretion a statute vests in an executive agency, particularly over decisions that sound like policy judgments, the more vulnerable the statute may be to legal attack. Congress can mitigate this concern by reducing the amount of decisionmaking it leaves to the agency implementing the law (e.g. the EPA or another agency).

Several justices have also embraced using the major questions doctrine to limit EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act, which does not explicitly mention greenhouse gases. As explained earlier, the major questions doctrine prohibits an agency from regulating on issues of broad social and economic importance without express congressional direction and delegation. Although the Court in Massachusetts v. EPA rejected an argument that the doctrine prevents EPA from regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act and found that the legislation covers greenhouse gases as “air pollutants,” the vote was 5-4 with Justices Roberts, Alito, and Thomas dissenting and Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch not yet on the Court. In a subsequent case, Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, conservative members of the Court upheld EPA’s greenhouse gas emissions regulations for new sources already regulated under the Clean Air Act but held that the agency could not extend those regulations to sources not already subject to regulation. The justices limited EPA’s regulatory reach using the major questions doctrine because Congress has not directly spoken to the issue of greenhouse gas regulation.

It is unclear what the relationship of the nondelegation doctrine and the major questions doctrine would be if employed; similarly, it is unclear how far the justices would go in striking down regulations or legislation under either.

Moreover, drawing the line between implementing a statute and legislating is, of course, a difficult question. Since the Court has only hinted at reviving the nondelegation doctrine rather than actually deciding a case on that basis, and has used the major questions doctrine sparingly, it is unclear exactly how that line would be drawn. Some justices might be uncomfortable with current statutory delegations; for example, EPA is responsible for determining which pollutants will be regulated under the Clean Air Act. Is determining which pollutants should be regulated “legislative,” and therefore an unconstitutional delegation of power to EPA, or merely the implementation of legislation?

Other justices might craft the nondelegation doctrine more narrowly, in conjunction with the major questions doctrine, to limit agency power over areas where Congress has failed to clearly delegate; for example, because the Clean Air Act doesn’t mention greenhouse gases, some justices have already suggested that any effort by EPA to regulate greenhouse gases might be struck down as an impermissible delegation of legislative power on a major question. This is so despite Massachusetts v. EPA’s rejection of a major questions challenge surrounding the same question. At this point, we simply do not have enough guidance from the justices who have indicated their interest in reviving the nondelegation doctrine to know exactly what its contours would be.

What Can Policymakers Do?

Now that the Court seems more likely to employ the nondelegation and major questions doctrines, Congress is left to determine how much it should legislate or delegate to an expert agency to regulate, and agencies like EPA will likely face uncertainty about the extent of their authority. Federal courts could invoke either or both doctrines when considering the power of regulatory agencies to implement future climate laws and regulations, so it is important for policymakers to try to anticipate their implications.

At the same time, a fundamental attribute of climate change policy is uncertainty about science, technology, and economics. Delegating a goal to an expert agency for it to develop, implement, and adapt policies may be the most effective way to address this challenge. It is impossible for Congress to specify every policy detail within a law, and this expectation is particularly unrealistic for environmental laws that require scientific expertise, technological judgment, and risk assessment, all of which change over time based on new developments and understanding. Proponents of the nondelegation and major questions doctrines have not clearly identified the appropriate degree of agency discretion for these matters.

Nevertheless, although our workshop experts did not always agree on how to craft legislation that includes delegations to expert agencies in the shadow of a skeptical Supreme Court, we have taken from our discussion several takeaways for climate policymakers and regulators as they consider whether and how to take into account potential nondelegation and major questions challenges:

 

  1. Delegate authority to agencies in ways that are similar to existing statutory authority that has already been upheld. For example, in Whitman v. American Trucking, the Court rejected a nondelegation challenge to the process by which EPA sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards under the Clean Air Act. Although the current conservative members of the Court were not part of the Whitman decision, it was a unanimous decision authored by Justice Antonin Scalia. The National Ambient Air Quality Standards could be an effective model for future legislative programs regulating climate change emissions and impacts given Whitman.
  2. Do not sacrifice ambition on climate change in order to defend against hypothetical judicial outcomes, especially given the ways in which background circumstances can change. To avert the worst consequences of climate change, we will need to see dramatic action to transform our systems of energy and transportation. Several commentators at the RFF–UCLA event stressed that Congress and EPA should not let the specter of a potentially bad judicial outcome keep them from regulating aggressively and effectively. To begin with, there is no reason to believe that nondelegation concerns are likely to be greater if a policy is ambitious rather than modest. Additionally, any federal policy adopted in the next year or two likely would not reach the high Court for several years. By 2024 or 2025, many things could change, including the composition of the Court. The effects of climate change may be even more apparent to the public and to the justices themselves, and therefore the public and members of the Court may better understand the urgent need for ambitious policy solutions. Although there are steps Congress and EPA can take to reduce the likelihood of a bad judicial outcome, the threat of judicial invalidation several years in the future should not keep Congress or the executive branch from acting boldly to prevent the worst effects of a warming planet. Finally, a policy can be ambitious without running afoul of the nondelegation doctrine—the NAAQS process is a good example.
  3. Avoid major questions by reducing ambiguity. At a minimum, if Congress is delegating authority to an administrative agency to regulate greenhouse gases, it should be absolutely clear that its intention is to delegate that authority. The major questions doctrine suggests that Congress needs to speak on an issue of great economic or social significance; in other words, being explicit could insulate a statute from judicial invalidation. Justice Kavanaugh has suggested that constitutional problems may be more acute when Congress has not clearly articulated that it is delegating authority over a specific policy area, so being clear may be the best strategy Congress can utilize to circumvent some of these concerns.
  4. To hedge against risk, use multiple strategies to reduce greenhouse gases. If Congress and executive agencies pursue multiple strategies to reduce greenhouse gases, some of those policies are likely to be upheld against legal challenges. One could call this the “don’t put all your eggs in one basket” approach. This is true for agency action as much as it is for congressional action: for example, regulations to control methane leaks from oil and gas operations may be upheld, whereas regulations to control hydrofluorocarbons may not, or vice versa. An ambitious package of policies—including regulations to control greenhouse gases, energy efficiency standards and policies, investments in research and development, tax incentives for renewable energy or carbon capture and storage, and a national renewable portfolio standard—will produce significant greenhouse gas reductions even if one or more pieces of the package are struck down.
  5. Model policy to look like existing regulatory structures, and avoid having a big policy look too different from prior regulations. Again, to use the NAAQS as an example, the Court has already upheld a structure that delegates authority to EPA to determine, – based on the best available science, which pollutants should be regulated and at what levels. Similarly, expanding and updating current regulatory programs that have already been upheld, like the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule and the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards, may be a less risky regulatory strategy from a legal perspective. EPA could use authority it hasn’t previously utilized significantly—such as Section 111(d) and Section 115 of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, but those regulations would be more likely to be upheld if they look like long-utilized tools in EPA’s toolbox. The point here is to model policy after already successful strategies, rather than to design something that strays too far from past experience.
  6. Create severable regulatory components, with a backstop, to isolate legal risks. Given that any new climate policy from Congress will face some risk of judicial invalidation, legislation should make clear that component parts of legislation are severable in order to avoid having an entire legislative approach struck down. In addition, Congress should also consider creating a backstop policy that takes effect in the event of invalidation: for example, legislation could be enacted that triggers a specific outcome such as a carbon price if other parts of the statute are not implemented (or if emissions reduction goals are not achieved). Adding a backstop would protect against losing emissions reductions if part of a piece of legislation were struck down.
  7. Well-designed policy remains important. As the Affordable Clean Energy Rule has demonstrated, a regulatory approach to reduce greenhouse gases that is based on the most minimal and internally inconsistentinterpretation of EPA’s authority barely reduces emissions, may even be counterproductive, and may itself not withstand legal challenge. Policymakers should carefully consider the legal implications of the nondelegation and major questions doctrines but should continue to value policies that are flexible and cost-effective and also reflect the realities of the sectors of the economy that they seek to regulate.
  8. The openness and inclusiveness of policy debate is critical. In both the legislative and regulatory policy pathways, it is important to develop a policy process that is transparent and reflects the input of all stakeholders, including bipartisan support where possible. This approach can not only improve the quality of the resulting policy but also make the policy more resilient to legal challenges.
  9. Finally, it is worth stressing that the federal courts’ use of the nondelegation and major questions doctrines is unpredictable. As a result, policymakers should be cognizant of the risk that legislation or regulations could be struck down and take practical and reasonable steps to avoid that risk. At the same time, they should not let concerns about a nondelegation or major questions challenge get in the way of smart and effective policymaking to tackle climate change.

 

 

 

The post Climate Policymaking in the Shadow of the Supreme Court appeared first on Legal Planet.

By: Ann Carlson
Title: Climate Policymaking in the Shadow of the Supreme Court
Sourced From: legal-planet.org/2020/10/27/climate-policymaking-in-the-shadow-of-the-supreme-court/
Published Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:58:36 +0000

Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston
8313 Southwest Freeway #102
Houston,TX,77074
(713) 785-9484
#Houston #Attorneys #Lawyers #PersonalInjury #AutoAccidents #TruckAccidents #HoustonLaw #Settlements #DUI

(Houston's Most Trusted Law Firm for Car Accident Settlements)
#CarAccidentAttorney, #CarAccident Lawyer, Houston Auto Accident Attorney, Auto Accident Lawyer, Auto Accident Law Firm, Auto Accident Settlement, Car Accident Settlement, Trucking Accident Lawyers, Truck Accident Attorneys, Trucking Lawsuit Settlements, Personal Injury Lawyers, Personal Injury Attorneys, Personal Injury Lawsuit Settlements

Vist Maida on Social Me


Website Links



Maida Law Firm - Auto Accident Attorneys of Houston, by fuseology


https://legal-planet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/24656553682_d71f6b5d41_z-400x300.jpg

Best CBD Gummies for Sleep: 2022’s Top 5 CBD Gummy Brands | Washingtonian (DC)

CBD RESOURCE NEWS & PRODUCTS Please Visit our CBD Store for the Best CBD on the Market Today. https://cbdresource.org Quick Links To Our...